Wood & Porter

Wood & Porter is one of the nation's premier boutique tax firms concentrating in areas of specific interest to trial lawyers, insurance companies and others concerned with tax issues related to settlements and litigation


Robert Wood Podcast Feed

Add to Google
ATG Trust Company
The Legal Broadcast Network
Search
Login
Tax Law Resources
Speaking of Justice Videos
« Rod Smolla Comments on Job Prospects for Law School Grads | Main | Film Industry Tax Incentives Money Pit »
Monday
17Aug2009

(Video) First Circuit Court revives massive Qui Tam case against Ortho Biotech Products

In a stunning turn of events on what could be one of the largest Qui Tam cases in US history, the First Jan SchlichtmannCircuit Federal Appeals Court released it's opinion today reinstating a part of the whistleblower claim against Ortho Biotech, the Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, regarding the alleged kick back scheme for it's drug Procrit.  

You may read the entire opinion by clicking the link here, The case number is 08-1409 and the name is United States, ex rel. Mark Eugene Duxbury and Dean McClellan, Plaintiffs vs Ortho Bio Products.

This case was spearheaded by Attorney Jan Schlichtmann on behalf of the relators Duxbury and MacClellan and when the trial court dismissed the claim, the appeal was filed and argued in mid 2008 and today's decision affirmed part of the decision but cleared the way for the Duxbury claim on kick backs and rebating tied to the off label marketing and use of Procrit in oncology clinics and hospitals.

In this exclusive interview, Duxbury and McClellan's attorney Jan Schlichtmann discusses the courts ruling, shares his thoughts on the elements that were affirmed as well as the next steps in this long dormant but now front page Whistle Blower case regarding Procrit and the marketing of it's off label use. As long time readers of this page will recall this was also featured in a Wall Street Journal profile on the case at about the time of  the original trial in 2007 and while many had given the case up for dead, the Appeals Court has done a comprehensive analysis of what the bar is to filing a Whistle Blower claim and brought in a real stunner on what could be a massive potential claim against Ortho Biotech.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>